Welcome to the Small Business Ideas Forum! We are a community of over 100,000 small business folks with over 163,000 posts for you to browse. We pride ourselves on being the friendliest forum you will find and we'd love to have you as a member of our community. Please take a moment and register for a free account. If you need any help, please contact Chris Logan.

Small Business Ideas Forum

Small Business Ideas Forum

A friendly place to share small business ideas and knowledge, ask questions, find help and encourage others that are involved in the small business industry. Topics include small business marketing, generating revenue and small business computing.

Go Back   Small Business Ideas Forum > Small Business Marketing - Online > Search Engine Optimization
Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 3rd September 2004, 12:02 AM   #1
StupidScript
Administrator
 
StupidScript's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 604
Default What would Google do?

Here's the scenario:

I have five websites, each connected to my business' ordering process.

The five sites each focus on one aspect of a particular industry, say, the fabric production industry.

They all overlap in certain sections of the content, say, in the raw materials production and processing sections. Of course, one website focuses nearly entirely on these subjects.

Someone searches for "raw wool production" using Google.

How would Google's algorithm (and those from other engines) handle this in the results display?

Would my sites be displayed in order of relevance, or would the display algorithm filter limit my exposure based on my ownership (and honest reporting of same)?

I ask because I haven't the patience to design the tests and collect the data and run the stats ...


__________________
James Butler - "Do no weevils"
JamesButler.net
MusicForHumans.com
StupidScript is offline   Reply With Quote
Register or log in to remove this ad.
Old 3rd September 2004, 11:58 PM   #2
Christian_SEO
Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Posts: 17
Default

Without seeing your sites, it seems that you have a good reason to have as many as you do. As long as the content is mostly different it can be a good approach. One large site is generally the preferred way to go, but I don't think it matters that much.

So if the sites are the same, the only other thing that could "bother" you is if the sites are all on the same IP address, or in the same IP "block". But if you are not heavily duplicating content, or using the same site template for all of them, I think your "risk" is very low. Even if there is some overlap, it may not be a problem, but if there is it should be reflected in the Google Page Rank of each site.

So, in my opinion, if you have five seperate sites and each has mostly different content with a different focus (even if one covers all, it's still different), then you have five sites and each will preform based on all the things that Google or other search engines consider.

You have not asked about site optimization, so I won't get into that, except to say that if you have not done so you should optimize each site based on it's content, and each should show up according to how well each is optimized. If you have some overlap and do a good job, then you should have some nice placements for each topics, but of course there may be gaps in the placements, as you might expect.

I hope this helps a little. I'm sure others will have an opinion also.

Christian_SEO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2004, 09:20 AM   #3
Old Welsh Guy
Moderator
 
Old Welsh Guy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 700
Default

HI SS, Google might do nothing, as it does not ban pages for duplicated content, and is crap at picking up cross linking. Yahoo! on the other hand is a different animal, it seems very able at picking up multiple domain cross linking sites, and drops them all from its index.

May I ask how different these sites are, and why you have separate sites all linking to a common order page? Surely this tells me that they are sections within a site rather than individual sites?

You could be throwing away the opportunity to be seen by Google as an expert hub or authority site.

__________________
Old Bald & Stupid, but more than compensated for by being born Welsh.
Google Expert blog - Internet Marketing Consultancy
Old Welsh Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2004, 01:42 PM   #4
David Wallace
Senior Member
 
David Wallace's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,049

Search Engine Guide Blogger

Default

I had a client that had about 10 web properties dealing with travel nursing in which they accepted online resumes through one form at one domain. They got all their sites kicked out of the top directories such as DMOZ, JoeAnt, GoGuides, etc. and now each domain has a history log at each of these directories as a domain spammer, at least in the eyes of editors there, even though each site is a different brand with its own content.

Moral of the story - keep your sites separate. There is no reason why each site cannot have its own order system or process.

__________________
David Wallace
SearchRank - Search Engine Marketing | Personal Blog
David Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2004, 05:33 PM   #5
Old Welsh Guy
Moderator
 
Old Welsh Guy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wales
Posts: 700
Default

Agreed David, it is that one element that concerns me, they are either separate, or combined. If combined, then one domain, if separatre, then no connection.

__________________
Old Bald & Stupid, but more than compensated for by being born Welsh.
Google Expert blog - Internet Marketing Consultancy
Old Welsh Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th September 2004, 09:40 PM   #6
Patrick
Member
 
Patrick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23
Send a message via ICQ to Patrick
Default

Quote:
If combined, then one domain, if separate, then no connection.
I think the way the pages on the various domains link to each other is more important than which domain they sit on, and that the overall link structure is the crucial thing to get right, even if it's only a very few links between the five domains.

Also if it were me, I would structure the whole thing around which pages you want to receive the most traffic (irrespective of which domain they're on).

In the long run the "big site" versus "small site" comparison is less important than how all the pages work together.

Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2004, 01:43 PM   #7
StupidScript
Administrator
 
StupidScript's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 604
Default

I think David and OWG brought to my attention the most-likely downsides of an arrangement as I described. The issues with Yahoo and single ordering mechanism.

We do have several dozen domains, each of which is designed and optimized for a different "perception of authority" and set of search phrases. Each site uses its own form submission interface, however all of the data ends up funnelling into our master database, back at the office.

My primary concern is due to the fact that our company has branded each of the sites. While each of the sites speak to separate facets of our industry, I believe that regardless of the sites' contents, we may be incurring penalties simply due to our ownership of the domains.

We want to continue to maintain separate sites so our visitors feel we have special insight into the different areas of our industry and to SEO the pages without getting too convoluted or too diluted.

We have determined that people who are looking for expertise in the different areas of our industry respond in different ways to different site designs, and that positioning ourselves within one site as a "swiss army knife" company capable of handling any aspect of our industry lessens the "perceived authority" we hold in any one of the areas, which encourages us to keep the sites separate yet still under our brand.

So, is the basic consensus (if there is one) that we might be incurring or maybe will incur some kind of search engine penalties unless we completely separate the sites (with different brands and such)?

__________________
James Butler - "Do no weevils"
JamesButler.net
MusicForHumans.com
StupidScript is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th September 2004, 10:06 PM   #8
Patrick
Member
 
Patrick's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 23
Send a message via ICQ to Patrick
Default

I don't think you will be incurring any search engine penalties at all, whether you choose to put your pages on one domain or on several. Google has no reason to downgrade your rankings just because of how you choose to organise your pages, as long as they are all bona fide. In my opinion there is no performance reason why you need to conceal or disguise what you've done from a search engine. From what you've said, you've built for humans.

It would be a different matter if you had duplicate content (however that is defined) or if you were cloning sites. And as I said, your link structure is important, as it would be within a single domain or across a large number.

Patrick

Patrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th September 2004, 10:20 AM   #9
David Wallace
Senior Member
 
David Wallace's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,049

Search Engine Guide Blogger

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StupidScript
We do have several dozen domains, each of which is designed and optimized for a different "perception of authority" and set of search phrases. Each site uses its own form submission interface, however all of the data ends up funnelling into our master database, back at the office.
If each site has its own data collecting interfaces then this should not be a problem and is not the same scenario I was referring to above. In the situation above, each site would send you to one specific domain where all the data collecting occurred. because each site was similar in nature, they were seen at least by editors of directories to be the same and as a result they would de-list all the sites with the exception of the main one that was collecting the data.

__________________
David Wallace
SearchRank - Search Engine Marketing | Personal Blog
David Wallace is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply   

Bookmarks




Thread Tools

Get Updates
RSS Feeds:
RSS Feed for Search Engine Optimization RSS for this Category Only: Search Engine Optimization

RSS Feed for Small Business Ideas Forum RSS for Entire Forum
Forum Rules


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Small Business Ideas Forum


 
At Your Business - Small Business Directory
Free Business Forms - Prewritten Documents
 
Search Engine Guide
Small business guide to search marketing

 
Small Business Brief
Fetching the Best Small Business Info


Free Links - Free Advertising
Free Guide - Online Directory



Advertise your business here
Contact us for more details!


Semantic Juice
Register now to access free Quick SEO service!


Rocket Lawyer
Sign up for free 7 day trial. Boost your biz!


Buy UPC Codes
Get your products listed online!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004 - 2018 - Privacy